Gun Control Will Not Prevent Violence essays

Gun Control Will Not Prevent Violence essays Gun Control Will Not Prevent Violence There is an outpouring cry for more gun control measures to prevent crimes and violence. However, throughout most of our history people have armed themselves for protection against criminals, invaders, and even abusive government. There are approximately four million new firearms - about two million being handguns - sold in the United States each year (8). The regulation of weapons and gun control laws will not solve the problem of violence and prevent crimes. Gun control laws do not work. Just the contrary, legitimate users of firearms submit to intense regulation, scrutiny, and bureaucratic control. Any effort to decrease the supply of firearms imposes damage on freedom and privacy that is fundamental to American life. The Brady bill, implemented in several states, requires a background-check and a five-day waiting period to acquire a handgun. The main accomplishment of this bill is the increase in hassle to the law-abiding citizen seeking a gun. Second Amendment scholar and attorney Stephen B. Halbrook debates the Second Amendment to the Constitution in his book That Every Man Be Armed. Halbrook states the Americans right to keep and bear arms grew out of political and philosophical tradition that dates back to the origins of Western Civilization. Halbrook notes as far back as Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, they shared the belief that an armed populace was essential for preventing the imposition of tyranny (7 12). It is arguable; the Second Amendment provides the right for everyone to bear arms, not just the militia. The principal justification for an armed populace was to secure the tranquility and good order of the community. In addition, Jim Babka, in his article Gun Control Only Seems Like a Good Idea!, he expounds on the 1982 Senate Subcommittee on the Constitutions confirmation that The Second Amendment is to provide protection of an indi...